lemonwaterlime 7 minutes ago

It would be nice if specific offending portions of the codebase were highlighted. As of now, it’s hard to see why one should use this fork. Also, since the source is available, anyone can just compile a past version of vim.

  • wffurr 2 minutes ago

    A cursory search didn't turn anything up in the vim repo or elsewhere. I can see why the authors of the fork wouldn't want to stir up drama, but I am really curious too.

erfgh 11 minutes ago

What is AI-taint and why is regular vim tainted?

  • wffurr 5 minutes ago

    I would guess it means they accepted AI generated submissions into the vim codebase.

    There's a discussion in the EVi repo about needing to find people who know vimscript. Funny enough, I am planning to use contributing some vimscript to an extension as my first AI coding agent project partly because I don't know vimscript well. Although that does mean it'll be hard to critically evaluate the output. I can compare it to the rest of the code in the extension at least to make sure it fits the style.

arikrahman 21 minutes ago

I was going to comment how it might be ironic to call the project evil instead, but remembered that's the name for the vim emulation on emacs.