mberlove 24 minutes ago

This specific finding is minor, but its implications are not IMHO. From the article it appears the researchers consider this a discovery in effect.

If consumer hardware is already capable (in many settings) of reproducing what were formerly research-level and industry-grade techniques, it may be a transformation in more areas of technology than would be obvious. I am very curious to see if there will be further findings in this area.

aftbit 19 minutes ago

Smartphone grade lidar == FaceID ?

ofrzeta 2 hours ago

So this only works if you have walls opposite of this corner?

  • libria 2 hours ago

    It seems to require a lidar reflective object. Likely more generally, the effectiveness lowers the less objects there are to bounce and return signal.

    It could probably work with less accuracy/resolution against visible vehicles in the opposite lane, a hedgerow, postal box, pedestrian carrying a visible laptop and possibly synthesize all of these to improve its guess.

  • wongarsu an hour ago

    The video thumbnail implies bouncing off the ground, not a wall. Not sure how the geometry works out for that

cuechan 4 hours ago

Why not just place a mirror at 45 degrees in the corner? That way you don't need the lidar but you can just look around the corner? It would also work better with the lidar.

  • devmor 3 hours ago

    I would be interested in seeing your visual mockups of how such a solution works on one of the article’s examples, like a car.