i’m not trying to dismiss this article entirely as i did get value around from discussion around verifying
but this coming from a VC firm invested in token producing companies and quoting the “genius” behind openclaw makes me think this is just an psyop of over engineering to get ppl to blindly spend tokens on the LLM slot machine
i’m not trying to dismiss this article entirely as i did get value around from discussion around verifying
but this coming from a VC firm invested in token producing companies and quoting the “genius” behind openclaw makes me think this is just an psyop of over engineering to get ppl to blindly spend tokens on the LLM slot machine
Not really; looping is a requirement when there's an imperfect generator: LLMs. I read the article some days ago and included the citation in my own.
For a longer explanation why, here's mine:
https://memseek.ai/blog/the-loop-has-always-been-there/
ps: not affiliated with a16 or similar
Put another token in the slop machine!
I failed to think of any polite words to express my feelings about this article.