Omarchy Funding Climbs to $13M, with over $4M a Year Set for Spendinglinuxiac.com4 points by dxs 12 hours ago
downrightmike 12 hours agoThis is clearly money launderingcolesantiago 11 hours ago> This is [clearly] money launderingThis is a serious allegation.Do you have a clear definitive reputable source for this claim of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering?copperx 6 hours agoGetting an investment of 13M for some config files is scandalous. Especially when the creator is rich himself.Mark Shuttleworth funded Ubuntu completely out of pocket.colesantiago 5 hours agoBut this isn't answering the question of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering.Where is the definitive source for this?copperx 5 hours agoYou took it as an allegation, I took it as an hypothesis.If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ...
colesantiago 11 hours ago> This is [clearly] money launderingThis is a serious allegation.Do you have a clear definitive reputable source for this claim of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering?copperx 6 hours agoGetting an investment of 13M for some config files is scandalous. Especially when the creator is rich himself.Mark Shuttleworth funded Ubuntu completely out of pocket.colesantiago 5 hours agoBut this isn't answering the question of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering.Where is the definitive source for this?copperx 5 hours agoYou took it as an allegation, I took it as an hypothesis.If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ...
copperx 6 hours agoGetting an investment of 13M for some config files is scandalous. Especially when the creator is rich himself.Mark Shuttleworth funded Ubuntu completely out of pocket.colesantiago 5 hours agoBut this isn't answering the question of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering.Where is the definitive source for this?copperx 5 hours agoYou took it as an allegation, I took it as an hypothesis.If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ...
colesantiago 5 hours agoBut this isn't answering the question of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering.Where is the definitive source for this?copperx 5 hours agoYou took it as an allegation, I took it as an hypothesis.If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ...
copperx 5 hours agoYou took it as an allegation, I took it as an hypothesis.If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ...
This is clearly money laundering
> This is [clearly] money laundering
This is a serious allegation.
Do you have a clear definitive reputable source for this claim of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering?
Getting an investment of 13M for some config files is scandalous. Especially when the creator is rich himself.
Mark Shuttleworth funded Ubuntu completely out of pocket.
But this isn't answering the question of Omarchy / The Omacom Foundation engaging in money laundering.
Where is the definitive source for this?
You took it as an allegation, I took it as an hypothesis.
If someone got paid 14 million as a dog walker, wouldn't you suspect something nefarious? Sure, it could be totally legit but ...